Skip to content
Architecture mining

Architecture mining

Foster architectural evolution through software operation data

Menu

  • Projects
    • Feature-based Architecture Recovery by Dialogue Extraction
    • Research and project ideas
  • Publications
  • Tools
    • HUSACCT
    • MicADO
    • ISModeler
  • Team
    • Jan Martijn van der Werf
    • Students

Month: November 2017

LAC 2017 – Quantitative analysis of profitability and vulnerability in e-business network

Door Roel Wieringa De meest ingewikkelde titel van het hele congres – aldus Roel. Geen enkele organisatie werkt meer alleen. Waarde wordt gecreëerd in netwerken. Maar hoe werken organisaties samen? Hoe kun je dat modelleren en analyseren? E3Value chains! Twee

Jan Martijn van der Werf November 17, 2017March 30, 2020 microblog Read more

LAC 2017 – Adapting your architecting style to the digital age

door Eltjo Poort  en Matthijs van Riel Wat “architecten” we eigenlijk? Vele dingen worden uitgedacht, maar onderliggende principes zijn gelijk. Traditionele, projectgebaseerde governance gebruikt woorden als conveive, elaborate, construct, en transform zijn vervangen door agile termen: “funnel, backlog, analysis en

Jan Martijn van der Werf November 17, 2017March 30, 2020 microblog Read more

LAC 2017 – Digitale transformatie begin bij je bedrijfscultuur

Door Saskia van Uffelen CEO Ericsson Belux Veel mensen denken bij digitaal meteen aan technologie. Maar eigenlijk gaat het hierbij over hoe we leven, en hoe dat verandert: het gaat om de evolutie van de maatschappij. Steeds meer dingen worden

Jan Martijn van der Werf November 17, 2017March 30, 2020 microblog Read more

IPA Fall days 2017 – Model-based testing of Probabilistic Systems with Stochastic Time

by Marcus Gerholdt Everybody likes testing, and everybody likes statistics… So let’s combine the two… In many large systems probability plays an important role, think of randomization in games, encryption, network traffic, etc. Probabilistic model checking tools exist, but are

Jan Martijn van der Werf November 9, 2017March 30, 2020 microblog Read more

IPA Fall days 2017 – Model-based Testing: from Theory to Practice

by Jan Tretmans Many hardware systems – even some Dutch dykes! – are actually “just” software. That dyke one has about 40k elements, whereas the software consists of 100M LOC. As such systems need to interact a lot, it becomes

Jan Martijn van der Werf November 9, 2017March 30, 2020 Uncategorized Read more

IPA Fall days 2017 – Testing the hard stuff and staying sane

By John Hughes Testing is typically something most people do not really like to do. Testing has this reputation of not being very fun. Why is testing hard? For n single features, there are O(n) test cases. However, you need

Jan Martijn van der Werf November 9, 2017March 30, 2020 microblog Read more

IPA Fall days 2017 – Type-based static analysis

By Jurriaan Hage As the halting problem in general is undecidable, it is possible that some programs can have a correct execution, but are not type-correct. That is why we need to study accuracy. To be on the safe side:

Jan Martijn van der Werf November 9, 2017March 30, 2020 microblog Read more

IPA Fall days 2017 – Analyzing Source Code using Rascal

By Jurgen Vinju The assumption is that for software to “be good”, you need to understand the code. However, most software engineers do not have time to read it. So, how can you understand it? Automatic analyis could help to

Jan Martijn van der Werf November 9, 2017March 30, 2020 microblog Read more

IPA Fall days 2017 – Not only maintainability: revisiting test smells as a measure of test code effectiveness

By Fabio Palomba Test cases form the first line of defense against the introduction of faults. But also, the entire team rely on regression tests to merge pull requests, or even to deploy a version. But test code can have

Jan Martijn van der Werf November 8, 2017March 30, 2020 microblog Read more

IPA Fall days 2017 – Telling stories about software developers

By Alexander Serebrenik Developers are people (citation needed) is how Robert Jongeling started his report. In a way, this is a pity: we always talk about the product, rather than about who create software. Based on some heuristics, they developed

Jan Martijn van der Werf November 8, 2017March 30, 2020 microblog Read more
  • « Previous

Archives

  • December 2021
  • April 2020
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017

Meta

  • Log in
Copyright © 2023 Architecture mining. Powered by WordPress. Theme: Spacious by ThemeGrill.